Your cart is empty now.
Report copyright infringement
by Isabela Mares (Author), Lauren E. Young (Author)
In many recent democracies, candidates compete for office using illegal strategies to influence voters. In Hungary and Romania, local actors including mayors and bureaucrats offer access to social policy benefits to voters who offer to support their preferred candidates, and they threaten others with the loss of a range of policy and private benefits for voting the "wrong" way. These quid pro quo exchanges are often called clientelism. How can politicians and their accomplices get away with such illegal campaigning in otherwise democratic, competitive elections? When do they rely on the worst forms of clientelism that involve threatening voters and manipulating public benefits?
Isabela Mares, Professor of Political Science, Yale University, Lauren E. Young, Assistant Professor of Political Science, University of California Davis
Guaranteed safe checkout:
There are 0 Items In Your Cart.
Added to cart successfully!
Total Price: $0.00