Your cart is empty now.
Report copyright infringement
by Ronald K. L. Collins (Author), David M. Skover (Author)
There is no book of political strategy more canonical than Niccol� Machiavelli's The Prince, but few ethicists would advise policymakers to treat it as a bible. The lofty ideals of the law, especially, seem distant from the values that the word "Machiavellian" connotes, and judges are supposed to work above the realm of politics. In The Judge, however, Ronald Collins and David Skover argue that Machiavelli can indeed speak to judges, and model their book after The Prince. As it turns out, the number of people who think that judges in the U.S. are apolitical has been shrinking for decades. Both liberals and conservatives routinely criticize their ideological opponents on the bench for acting politically. Some authorities even posit the impossibility of apolitical judges, and indeed, in many states, judicial elections are partisan. Others advocate appointing judges who are committed to being dispassionate referees adhering to the letter of the law. However, most legal experts, regardless of their leanings, seem to agree that despite widespread popular support for the ideal of the apolitical judge, this ideal is mere fantasy.
Ronald K.L. Collins is Harold S. Shefelman Scholar, University of Washington School of Law.David M. Skover is Fredric C. Tausend Professor of Law, Seattle University School of Law
Guaranteed safe checkout:
There are 0 Items In Your Cart.
Added to cart successfully!
Total Price: $0.00